[trafficsafety] Re: [shift] Re: enforcement based on safety concerns
Curt;
This a perfect writeup! We should definately discuss this at the next
Traffic Safety Meeting. Let's devise a strategy for what changes we
want established.
Aaron Tarfman
Transportation Diplomat
www.yourbodypower.org
"It's amazing to me that people can save $7000 a year by making a simple lifestyle change."
Curt Dewees wrote:
> Suppose there were no more cars and everyone was bicycling or walking.
> Would there be no more need for stop signs or stoplights at
> intersections? How would we prevent bike-on-bike or bike-on-pedestrian
> collisions and crashes?
>
> Perhaps the laws do need to be changes.
>
> When Rosa Parks deliberately broke the law by sitting in the front of
> the bus, it was part a well-organized strategy that the civil rights
> movement had planned in advance. Rosa Parks was hand-picked to be the
> person who would deliberately break the law. She fully expected to be
> arrested, and the civil rights movement had a plan in place for what
> they would do next after she was arrested. They were able to use her
> arrest to as a test case to garner public attention and support to the
> cause.
>
> Perhaps we should take a look at what laws need to be changed, and
> what the new, improved laws might look like. Then we can develop a
> consensus among bicyclists for a plan of action as to how we can
> effectively protest the existing laws and build widespread public
> support for our cause.
>
> But for me to just run a red light and then complain that I got caught
> and ticketed for breaking a "bad" law doesn't really accomplish much
> of anything, other than emptying my pocket.
>
>
> On 10/28/06, Pinga de Clown <pinga@clownhouse.org> wrote:
>
>> On 10/24/06, Curt Dewees <curt.dewees@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From the way you describe the situation, the ticket was well
>> deserved, and
>> the police officer's concerns were reasonable and based on common sense.
>>
>> Common sense or common stupidity? Enforcing laws that were never made
>> considering bike a major type of transportation and considering it's
>> characteristics is nothing more than an automated act of brutality.
>>
>> And, speaking of being "squished", as long as we - THE BICYCLISTS -
>> accept
>> this rotten mentality of respecting and accepting rules and rights
>> that only
>> exist to maintain the "status-quo" (that, in case you haven't noticed,
>> stinks like burnt oil) we are going to get (culturally) squished by
>> them.
>> These rules have the inverse mentality that bikes and people are in
>> the way
>> of car traffic, instead os a more sensitive "cars are in the way of
>> life".
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________
>
> The homepage for this list can be found at
> http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/shift
> People may unsubscribe by sending mail to:
> shift-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net
>
_________________________________________
The homepage for this list can be found at:
http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/trafficsafety
People may unsubscribe by sending mail to:
trafficsafety-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net
